top of page
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Youtube

Epic Beaker Go-Live Is the Handoff, Not the Finish Line

  • Writer: JTG Consulting Group
    JTG Consulting Group
  • May 14
  • 6 min read
Two smiling people stand at a podium labeled Executive War College; abstract background with a JTG logo, emphasizing a professional setting.

Epic Beaker go-live is a major milestone for any health system, hospital laboratory, or community lab. But the work does not end when the system goes live. In many ways, that is when the next phase begins.


At Executive War College, Carlos A. Vega II, Director of Laboratory Information Systems at Baylor Scott & White Health, and Susan Mize, Chief Services Officer at JTG Consulting Group, presented “Balancing Implementation and Optimization in Epic Beaker for Large Health Systems and Community Labs.” Their session focused on a critical Lab IT challenge: how organizations can move from implementation to stabilization, and then from stabilization to long-term optimization, without overwhelming laboratory operations or IT teams.

  

The central takeaway was clear: go-live is the handoff, not the finish line.


For laboratories, that distinction matters. Epic Beaker is not just another EHR module. It supports the operational engine of the lab, connecting workflows, instruments, middleware, testing processes, reporting, and clinical decision-making. When the system is live, the organization needs more than support. It needs structure, governance, prioritization, and a realistic path to continuous improvement. 

 

Why Epic Beaker Optimization Requires a Lab-First Approach 


Laboratory IT is different from general healthcare IT.


Lab workflows are highly specialized. They depend on accurate build, reliable interfaces, instrument connectivity, middleware alignment, validation, regulatory readiness, and consistent communication between operations and IT. A small issue in the lab can have a large downstream impact on turnaround times, clinical workflows, staff confidence, and patient care. 


That is why Epic Beaker optimization requires a lab-first approach.


At JTG, Lab IT is what we do. Our team works alongside LIS, middleware, instrument, blood bank, pathology, and operational teams to help organizations reduce risk, improve alignment, and support long-term performance. Epic Beaker implementation is only one part of the journey. The larger opportunity is helping labs stabilize, optimize, and scale after go-live. 


Speaker in a suit at a podium, addressing an audience. A presentation screen displays text on consulting. Room is neutral-toned.

Baylor Scott & White Health: Epic Beaker at Enterprise Scale 


Baylor Scott & White Health brought an enterprise-scale perspective to the Executive War College discussion.


As one of the largest health systems in Texas, Baylor Scott & White Health operates across a broad and complex care environment, including hospitals, clinics, surgery centers, digital care, health plan operations, and laboratory services. The presentation highlighted the scale of the organization, including more than 1,300 care sites, 57,000 employees, 47 laboratories, 13.5 million professional encounters annually, and 1.2 million covered lives across health plan and accountable care operations.

  

That scale creates unique Lab IT challenges. The larger the organization, the more important it becomes to balance standardization with local operational needs. Post-go-live requests can come from many directions: laboratory operations, clinical teams, IT, instruments, interfaces, upgrades, regulatory requirements, and new business priorities.


In an environment that large, Epic Beaker optimization cannot rely on informal prioritization or one-off decision-making. It requires a disciplined, transparent approach that helps teams focus on the work that matters most. 

 

The Post-Go-Live Reality: Demand Comes from Every Direction 


After an Epic Beaker go-live, teams often experience a rapid increase in requests. Some are urgent. Some are operationally important. Some are optimization opportunities. Others are tied to upgrades, instruments, interfaces, or broader Epic changes.


Without clear governance, everything can feel like a priority.


That is one of the most common challenges after a major Beaker implementation. Teams are working hard, but without a structured approach, it becomes difficult to prioritize efforts, manage risk, and maintain momentum across the organization. 


Carlos and Susan’s presentation emphasized the importance of creating structure after go-live. The goal is not to slow the work down. The goal is to make sure the right work is happening at the right time, with the right input from laboratory and IT leadership. 

 

Stabilization Comes First 


Immediately after go-live, the priority is stability. 


The early post-live period is about protecting operations, supporting users, resolving issues, and giving the organization room to adjust. This is not the time to chase every enhancement or redesign every workflow. It is the time to focus on continuity, confidence, and reliability. 


For Epic Beaker, stabilization may involve support for laboratory workflows, system performance, reporting, interfaces, instrument connectivity, user adoption, and issue resolution. The exact work will vary by organization, but the principle is consistent: stabilize first, optimize next. 


This sequencing matters because a laboratory cannot optimize effectively if the foundation is still shifting. Stabilization gives teams the confidence and clarity needed to move into longer-term improvement. 

 

Two speakers present about Epic Optimization at a podium labeled Executive War College. A woman in a floral dress and a man in a suit face an audience.

Optimization Is an Ongoing Program, Not a One-Time Project 


Once the organization has stabilized, the focus can shift toward optimization.


Epic Beaker optimization is not a single project with a fixed endpoint. It is an ongoing program that helps the lab improve over time. Optimization may include workflow refinement, instrument and automation integration, middleware improvements, test menu expansion, outreach growth, blood bank workflows, upgrade readiness, and support for mergers, acquisitions, or new service lines.


For large health systems and community labs, the key is to avoid treating optimization as a backlog of disconnected requests. The most successful organizations connect optimization work to operational goals and focus on asking better questions that align technology decisions with laboratory priorities. 


When optimization is aligned with business and clinical priorities, the Lab IT function becomes more strategically aligned with laboratory operations.


 

Governance Creates Focus 


Governance was one of the most important themes from the Executive War College presentation.


In Lab IT, governance is not bureaucracy. It is the framework that helps organizations make better decisions. It clarifies how priorities are evaluated, who needs to be involved, how work is sequenced, and how teams stay aligned across operations and IT. 


Strong governance helps prevent common post-live challenges, including duplicate requests, unclear ownership, competing priorities, bottlenecks, and resource strain. 


For Epic Beaker optimization, governance should do three things well: 

  • First, it should connect IT work to laboratory operations.

  • Second, it should give leaders visibility into what is being prioritized and why.

  • Third, it should provide a clear pathway for escalation when something truly needs urgent attention. 


When governance is done well, teams can move faster because they are aligned. 

 

Operational Leaders Must Help Set Priorities 


One of the strongest lessons from the presentation was the importance of listening to laboratory operations.


LIS teams understand the system, the build, the interfaces, and the technical dependencies. Laboratory leaders understand where the operational pain points are, what is affecting staff, and where support will have the greatest impact.


Epic Beaker optimization works best when those perspectives come together. 

The goal is not for IT to prioritize in isolation. The goal is to create a partnership where operational leaders help identify what matters most, while LIS and IT teams evaluate complexity, sequencing, dependencies, and execution.


That balance is especially important in large health systems, where a single decision may affect multiple hospitals, regions, laboratories, or service lines. 

 

Change Management Supports Sustainable Improvement 


Epic Beaker optimization also depends on strong change management. 


Laboratories operate in a highly controlled environment. Changes need to be reviewed, approved, communicated, tested, documented, and implemented in a way that protects quality and consistency. 


Post-go-live change management is not just about tracking requests. It is about creating a reliable process that supports operational visibility, regulatory readiness, and long-term stability. 


As Carlos and Susan discussed, organizations should look for ways to simplify and strengthen change management using tools they already have. The broader lesson is not about any one platform. The lesson is that change management should be visible, repeatable, and built for the pace of the lab.


When change management is strong, teams spend less time chasing information and more time improving performance.

 

What Health Systems and Community Labs Can Learn 


The Executive War College presentation offered practical lessons for any organization planning, completing, or recovering from an Epic Beaker implementation.


The biggest lesson is that post-go-live success requires intentional planning.


Health systems and community labs should think beyond the implementation date and prepare for the full post-live journey: stabilization, prioritization, governance, optimization, change management, and long-term support.


Organizations that are most successful after go-live typically take a structured, long-term approach to managing both operational and technical demands. They recognize that lasting value comes from strong alignment, thoughtful prioritization, and a clear strategy for ongoing improvement.


That is how organizations move from simply being live on Epic Beaker to realizing long-term value from Epic Beaker. 


Susan Mize gives a presentation at a podium with a sign reading "Executive War College." Audience members are seated, listening attentively about Epic Beaker Optimization.

 

Final Thought: The Value Comes After Go-Live 


Epic Beaker implementation is a major achievement. But the long-term value is created after go-live.


That is when teams refine workflows, strengthen governance, improve stability, reduce friction, prepare for upgrades, support growth, and turn the system into a stronger foundation for laboratory operations.


Carlos Vega II and Susan Mize’s Executive War College presentation highlighted a message that every lab and health system should take seriously: go-live is not the finish line. It is the beginning of the next phase of Lab IT maturity.


At JTG, we help organizations navigate that next phase.


Whether your lab is preparing for Epic Beaker go-live, stabilizing after implementation, working through a growing optimization backlog, planning instrument and middleware integrations, or building a stronger post-live governance model, JTG brings the Lab IT experience needed to support the journey.


Need help with Epic Beaker post-go-live support or optimization? Contact JTG to learn how our Lab IT experts can help your organization stabilize, prioritize, and optimize with confidence. 


For more details from the Executive War College presentation, or to learn more about the lessons from the Baylor Scott & White Health and JTG collaboration, contact JTG at contact@jtg.group or call +1 888-980-5329 in the U.S. or +44 (0) 20 4591 3176 in the U.K. 



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page